IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> The Glycemic Index, let's discuss it
Celadon
post May 12 2008, 01:43 PM
Post #1




Local Yokel
*******

Group: Neighbor
Posts: 2,918
Joined: 16-July 07
From: Florida
Member No.: 821
Arrival Date: 7/31/2007
Permission to Quote:Yes




Are you confused by the talk about the glycemic index and how important it is? I know I was. It took a lot of reading and research to even come up with some idea of what the big deal was. When I post articles, it is mostly for people who just want it in terms they can understand without having to read through a medical dictionary to 'get it'. I believe in just putting it all out there when I finally have enough information to say something so here goes. By the way, please jump in if you have anything to add to the subject or if you think you can help clarify it.

The glycemic index (GI) ranks food on a scale of 0 to 100 according to how much the carbohydrates in those foods raise your blood sugar after you eat them compared to a reference food. The current reference food is glucose and it is given a standing GI of 100.

Low glycemic foods are called slow carbs and raise your blood sugar only a little in a constant and steady manner. They provide balanced, long lasting energy and leave you feeling fuller for a longer time between meals.

High glycemic foods are called bad carbs and raise your blood sugar quickly which provokes an unhealthy insulin response. They provide only short bursts of energy followed by a dramatic energy crash.

Low glycemic foods have a GI of 55 or less.

Medium glycemic foods have a GI of 56 to 69.

High glycemic foods have a GI of 70 or more.

The Glycemic Load is the most practical way to apply the GI to diet, and is easily calculated by multiplying a food's GI (as a percentage) by the number of net carbohydrates in a given serving. Glycemic Load gives a relative indication of how much that serving of food is likely to increase your blood sugar levels. Most nutritional experts consider Glycemic Loads below 10 to be low and above 20 to be high. Low Glycemic Load meals are often recommended for diabetic control and weight loss.

GL = GI/100 x Net Carbs
(Net Carbs are equal to the Total Carbohydrates minus Dietary Fiber)

Looks easy right? Well, the problem is that to calculate the Glycemic Load, you must first determine the food's GI, which can only be done by human testing. Only a limited number of laboratories perform these tests so GI data is only available for a small percentage of the foods that we eat. We, as home chefs, have no way to determine the Glycemic Load for any of our own recipes. We need a way to estimate the Glycemic Load when the GI is unknown.

In a nutshell, the GI measures the speed with which the carbohydrate in a given food is digested therefore it also measures the speed with which the carbohydrate it contains hits the blood sugar.

If you would like to see a list of the GI of many of the foods you eat, you can click on the link below and scroll to the bottom of the section, "Revised International Table of GI Values". On the left, you will see "view this table" and you can click on one of the options provided.

Glycemic Index Table


--------------------



260 / 146 / 150
Starting weight /Current weight/Goal weight
Lap RNY - July 31, 2007
Life is what happens while you are making plans to do something else.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 3)
BeJean
post May 12 2008, 03:31 PM
Post #2




Ambassador of Reception
*********

Group: Neighbor
Posts: 5,872
Joined: 12-December 07
From: Wilmington, Ohio
Member No.: 1,815
Arrival Date: October 23, 2007
Personal Stats: Roux-en-Y 10/23/2007, Dr. John Maguire @ Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton
Permission to Quote:Yes




Barbara,
Good post for those who didn't know.
Clarification please. My understanding is that Net Carbs=Total Carbs - fiber - sugar alcohols. I don't see the sugar alcohols in your equation. At least that's how net carbs is defined by all of the low carb diets.


--------------------




It's not the bumps in the road that count, but how you finish the journey. ~~BeJean 2009

For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. ~Jeremiah 29:11 NIV

A lifetime journey with my pouch, Lucille...from a fat little caterpillar to a delicate butterfly...(and I've got the wings to prove it!)

'Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly' ~~author unknown



..... ..... .....

Open RNY 10/23/2007
Dr. John Maguire, Premier Bariatric Assoc., Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH
Starting weight 318.6 lbs (highest 354 lbs); See ticker for current stats


Surgery Ticker (add to this the 36 lbs lost before surgery):



My Winter Heat Accountability Challenge goals:
--Continue to drink 64 oz water daily
--Continue to take my vitamins/supplements
--Improve my eating habits. I need to get better control of my carb intake
--Work on upper body strength
--Lose 10 lbs before the Spring Challenge starts
--Revised 2/3/10: Maintain current weight until my mindset is to start losing again
--Be honest here (WHAC) as to whether I'm doing well or not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jules
post May 12 2008, 03:51 PM
Post #3




Ambassador of Reception
*******

Group: Neighbor
Posts: 1,529
Joined: 31-January 08
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 2,530
Arrival Date: 2-24-2003
Permission to Quote:Yes




This is so confusing, thanks Barbara for the information!

Jeannie - good job on the 5 lbs on the 6-week challenge!!!! cool0012.gif


--------------------
Jules

Ambassador of Reception

Lap RNY 2-24-03
Stanford Hospital
328/296/152/170/160
highest/day of WLS/lowest/current/goal

5'7" and 46 years old

Happily married & mother of 3 grown children
Also mother to 3 big spoiled dogs

Plastic Surgery 1-18-07
full abdominoplasty (tummy tuck)
breast lift & implants
brachioplasty (upper arms)


As my friend Jeanie says...."Don't be controlled by a box with a big spring in it"....words to live by neighbors!


My before picture, this was a week before my WLS but not my highest weight, I was 296 in this picture, 328 at my highest:

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Celadon
post May 12 2008, 05:28 PM
Post #4




Local Yokel
*******

Group: Neighbor
Posts: 2,918
Joined: 16-July 07
From: Florida
Member No.: 821
Arrival Date: 7/31/2007
Permission to Quote:Yes




Jeanie, I understand your comment and why you see it that way but the explaination of the Glycemic Load doesn't have anything to do with diet. It's purpose is to solely account for speed in which a body turns energy into sugar. Since sugar is the reference food used in just about all research, it is already a part of the equation even though that isn't stated. I figured out a while ago that sugar is most likely the reference food because it has the highest possible Glycemic Index score which is 100. I get the purpose for wanting to figure out the Glycemic Load but I don't understand it all even after spending many hours reading. Just about the time I think I have it figured out, another thought pops into my head and I have to do more research.

It could also be simply that the researchers that concocted the formula don't recognize sugar alcohol in the determining of net carbs. I only know that this is the formula that all researchers I have read about use.

I have decided that the point to the whole thing for me is to know that if a food has a HIGH Glycemic Index, I need to eat it very sparingly and if it has a LOW Glycemic Index, I can pretty much eat it as often as I like as long as I have taken in the other nutrients that I need.

Thanks for the question. I either helped you understand it better or I confused you even more! This is a subject that has many differing opinions because there are so many differing ways of going about figuring it all out. One of the reasons I wanted to post a topic about the Glycemic Index and the Glycemic Load was to see if anyone had a clearer picture of it. When we all put our heads together, we pretty much figure it out.

QUOTE(BeJean @ May 12 2008, 06:31 PM) *
Barbara,
Good post for those who didn't know.
Clarification please. My understanding is that Net Carbs=Total Carbs - fiber - sugar alcohols. I don't see the sugar alcohols in your equation. At least that's how net carbs is defined by all of the low carb diets.


--------------------



260 / 146 / 150
Starting weight /Current weight/Goal weight
Lap RNY - July 31, 2007
Life is what happens while you are making plans to do something else.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 06:11 AM

"The Neighborhood is a division of LivingAfterWLS, LLC
Post Office Box 311, Evanston, WY 82931
Founder: Kaye Bailey
© 2006-2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The health content in the LivingAfterWLS Neighborhood is intended to inform, not prescribe, and is not meant to be a substitute for the advice and care of a qualified health-care professional."